{"id":1923,"date":"2017-10-13T22:44:56","date_gmt":"2017-10-13T20:44:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.adimec.com\/rugged-cameras-mil-std-810-compliance\/"},"modified":"2018-07-27T17:13:41","modified_gmt":"2018-07-27T15:13:41","slug":"rugged-cameras-mil-std-810-compliance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.adimec.com\/ja\/rugged-cameras-mil-std-810-compliance\/","title":{"rendered":"Rugged Cameras \u2013 MIL-STD-810 Compliance"},"content":{"rendered":"
To conserve or not to conserve (on specifications)? How helpful is it to know the best case scenario? When integrating components into systems, of course the typical specifications are important, but consistency and reliability information is more useful. Obviously this is all the <\/p>\n Reliability is the probability that a device, system, or process will perform its prescribed duty without failure for a given time when operated correctly in a specified environment. Compliance with the MIL-STD-810<\/a> is a well-established way to verify reliability for extreme environments.<\/p>\n<\/a> more of a concern with systems used in harsh outdoor environments<\/a>, including surveillance and defense systems. Performance data under ideal conditions, in controlled laboratories serves very little purpose here.<\/p>\n