{"id":1757,"date":"2015-04-02T22:44:25","date_gmt":"2015-04-02T20:44:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.adimec.com\/ccd-versus-cmos-blooming-and-smear-performance\/"},"modified":"2018-07-30T09:25:41","modified_gmt":"2018-07-30T07:25:41","slug":"ccd-versus-cmos-blooming-and-smear-performance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.adimec.com\/ja\/ccd-versus-cmos-blooming-and-smear-performance\/","title":{"rendered":"CCD versus CMOS: blooming and smear performance"},"content":{"rendered":"
For many years CCD image sensors and cameras have offered advantages in image quality such as greater dynamic range, better noise performance, and better uniformity<\/a>. For this reason, CCD cameras were still used in many of the most demanding machine vision systems needing the highest accuracy or in global security systems where sensitivity in low light is critical<\/a>.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Now CMOS image sensors and cameras have caught up or even surpassed performance of CCD image sensors<\/a> such as in sensitivity and dynamic range.\u00a0 This means the change over from CCD to CMOS is happening now in many markets. \u00a0With this, we are reevaluating the strengths and weaknesses of CCD and CMOS image sensors.<\/p>\n